IOW, why not just start with the browsers that have these features built-in by default?Įdit: I should answer your question - will a better Firefox "turn up the heat"? Of course, but I don't think other browsers are going to stand still. In the end, what appears to be happening is that there are a core set of extensions rising to the surface that pretty much offer the same features already present in other power browsers such as OmniWeb, Opera and iCab and not much else (sometimes they are better implemented, but just as often they are worse), and these are slowly integrated into Firefox itself. There could be much better implemented alternatives, but finding them demands an immense amount of time and patience. The current rating system just leads to those extensions that became most popular early on staying most popular because they are the only ones that are easy to find. Due to the bewildering number of extensions available, trying to find an extension that really carries off the one feature you would like is often very difficult. Similarly, the extensibility of FF, though one of its greatest strengths is also a huge weakness. It is also worth pointing out that even if 3.0 or any future version of Firefox is written to support OS X fully, it is still an app written for three different platforms (both a strength and a weakness) and it will still suffer usability flaws because of its need to fit three very different UI philosophies. There are also plenty of other power user features that can be added, and further improvements could be made with respect to integration with the OS and other apps to keep OmniWeb enticing to the user to stay with it. The Workspaces feature, which is currently OmniWeb's trump card for me, could be made even more advanced and tab handling could be improved (that is, have tabs open by their parent rather than at the bottom of the list, return to the last tab used rather than the one immediately above, etc). I think there are quite a few things that could stand improvement in OmniWeb - autofill and RSS being two of the most obvious.
#Omniweb comparison free
What do you think could happen to OmniWeb to help keep competitive with a free browser that may catch up to it in terms of speed, integration, and features? I'm not sure if I would switch back to Firefox now (although I would kinda like to see some sort of skinning option in OmniWeb, even if it's just icon sets), but I have trouble thinking of what I would like to see added to OmniWeb that would make the experience better.ĭo others think that FF3.0 might "turn up the heat" in browser competition on OS X? Does OW have areas to expand that will keep it with a leg up on the competition? Is FF gaining Cocoa/Keychain/etc. It will still support the thousands of Firefox extensions out there. It's been long known that Firefox 3.0 is going to be native Cocoa and support all the fancy OS X features. However, I'm curious about the next major release of Firefox (I know, I know, it's still a ways off). Combine the speed and OS X-y-ness of Safari with built in features that matched a majority of the extensions I had for Firefox. Most importantly, it integrates itself and supports many OS X features and protocols. Then I found OmniWeb, I loved the quick rendering, loved the tab drawer (although after several months of usage, kinda miss my tab bar that's a topic that's been beat to death though), loved workspaces, and moreover, loved how rich in features it was. Also, at least on my computer, there's a big fat memory leak in it and it takes no time for it's memory usage to balloon to the > 500mb range. Safari was missing a lot of things I like, and honestly, I think it's pretty ugly. I tried Shiira, and it would just crash all the time. I tried Opera, and really did not like it right from the get go it just didn't feel right.
It has pretty basic functionality and no extension support. I tried Camino, however going to that from Firefox was like using the internet without arms.
#Omniweb comparison mac
Also, FF ran worse on my new Mac than it did on my old PC. Firefox 2.0 was a good step forward, but still was lacking. system-wide spell check, keychain integration, address book integration, etc.). Then, slowly, I realized that there's so much functionality built into OS X that FF wasn't tapping into, and would make life far easier if it did (i.e.
I had always used Firefox on my PC, so naturally I was plenty happy using Firefox in OS X.
I switched to a Mac at the beginning of last summer (~May 2006). I was just thinking about this, and I'm curious what others/development have to say about this.
0 kommentar(er)
